原帖由
tonyktng 於 2007-2-12 02:14 PM 發表
Hello, I knew I used some strong language. Sorry if you feel uncomfortable. I always like that, I got a big and sting mouth.
Really sorry again!
My opinion is MG Zaku II is classic, the silhouette is really good and you done it nicely!! I did built 2 before(mass production and Char version). The mass production one was cracked by sun light(real weathering
), color changed, plastic cracked. Hope I can take some photo to the Char version later. It was 7-8 years old.
Hey buddy, that's alright. Don't keep it in mind. I do agree that Zaku II is a classic MS and I should make one in my life. I do wanna clarify certain points:
1. I enjoy 補夾口 and it's a good fun to fuse two parts together. however, there are still someone who don't know how to work it out. They will be hurt cause your language is too strong for them.
2. You are most likely a great fan of Zaku, mee too. But I think there are more drawbacks than you think of. I'm not criticising the outlook or the proportion of Zaku, it's great. What I'm not happy is the design of the assembly. I check the menu of Zaku F2 and I made Hi-Zack before. They're completely different, though still need to 補夾口. If the design of Zaku II is satisfactory, why did Bandai need to changeand modify in later productions? We are customers and Bandai has to keep us happy. That's why we have version 1 version 2 or even version 3 in the future. If we don't refelct, there won't be any advancement in the design.
3. I hate Bandai's strategy cause they "renew" a product by changing the colour scheme or the wrapping box, without changing anything else. You said I'm stupid, that's true, but not because of 補夾口. It is because I bought a product manufactured in 200X, but actually it's the same as the one in 1995.
Anyway, I apprecite your opinion but we need to reflect if we are not happy. We don't need to live in caves anymore because of the strong desire to improve from our ancesters, right?
分享
