條例好清晰. 看看你所轉載的條例內容已知道.
車隊亦冇可能蒙查查得過我地.
問題便好可能是資源(人手)不足. 未能百分百檢測所有零件所致. 始終是細隊.
It seems a manufacturing error.
Sauber have three versions of the flap available and two were brought to Melbourne.
It seems the version raced was not fully checked at the factory and therefore the error was not picked up, whereas the other (un-raced) specification flap was checked and deemed legal.
Not every car and every component gets fully checked by the FIA scrutineers. The cars will go through different tests at different points in the weekend. It seems the Sauber flap in question was not tested until after the race.
還記得2010 季前 Sauber 幾乎摺埋 (BMW唔玩), 創辦人 Peter Sauber 接翻手肯定艱苦經營
舊年架車的拉花同十字車冇乜分別 (白晒晒). 就知係咩環境.
好在 Peter Sauber 同法拉利關係密切 (被 BMW 收購前是法拉利的 "二隊"
咁滯) 得到貴人扶持
2002年幫法拉利 "陪養" 欽點車手馬沙baby,
2004年的 C23 "幾乎"同 F2003GA 一模一樣 (其實極可能就是同一樣東西
)
長期採用法拉利引擎,
今年的新人 Sergio Perez 其實係 Ferrari Driver Academy 的車手, 帶住同胞世界首富Carlos Slim 旗下的墨西哥電訊 Telmex 的贊助 money 一齊"空降" Sauber.....有傳聞, Perez 如果在 Sauber 有表現, 張會是馬沙baby的代替者云云
如果變成事實, 馬沙baby就冇得怨囉! Perez 行緊你一樣條路咋!